Editorial Guidelines

Trends in Medical and Biological Sciences is committed to excellence in publishing within the fields of medicine and biological sciences. These editorial guidelines establish a transparent, ethical, and rigorous framework for authors, reviewers, and editors. Our goal is to ensure that all submissions are evaluated with scientific integrity, fairness, and professionalism throughout the entire publication process.

1. Submission and Initial Evaluation

Scope and Relevance
Manuscripts must be original contributions that fall within the scope of medicine, biological sciences, biotechnology, public health, or related fields. Authors are encouraged to review the journal’s Aims & Scope before submitting.

Plagiarism Screening
All submissions undergo mandatory plagiarism checks using recognized tools (e.g., Turnitin). The journal enforces a strict 10% similarity threshold. Manuscripts exceeding this limit may be rejected or returned for revision.

Manuscript Format Requirements
Submissions must follow the Author Guidelines and include:

  • Title and author details

  • Abstract and keywords

  • IMRAD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion)

  • References (APA or Vancouver style, depending on the study type)

  • Tables, figures, ethical statements, and funding disclosures

Licensing Terms
All accepted articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits distribution with proper attribution, but prohibits commercial use or modification.

2. Peer Review Policy

Double-Blind Review
The journal follows a double-blind peer review process:

  • Authors and reviewers remain anonymous

  • At least two independent expert reviewers evaluate each manuscript

Reviewer Selection & Ethics
Reviewers are selected for their subject expertise and must declare any conflicts of interest that could compromise objectivity.

Confidentiality
Review materials are strictly confidential and must not be shared or used for personal benefit.

Timeliness
Reviewers are expected to return their evaluations within 2–4 weeks. Editors oversee the process to avoid unnecessary delays.

3. Editorial Decision-Making

Possible Decisions
Based on reviewer reports, the editorial team may decide to:

✅ Accept the manuscript
✏️ Request minor or major revisions
❌ Reject the manuscript

Authors receive a decision letter with constructive feedback.

Revision and Resubmission
Authors must address reviewer comments point-by-point and submit a revised version within the assigned deadline.

Appeals
Authors may appeal decisions by submitting a formal request. Appeals are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and, if necessary, an independent expert.

4. Ethical Standards and Responsibilities

Authorship
Only those who made significant contributions to the study should be listed as authors. The corresponding author ensures that all co-authors approve the submission and final version.

Conflict of Interest
Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any financial, institutional, or personal interests that could bias the research or review process.

Research Ethics Compliance
Studies involving humans, animals, or clinical trials must include:

  • Approval from an institutional ethics committee (e.g., IRB)

  • Statements of informed consent (where applicable)

5. Post-Publication Policy

Corrections and Retractions
If serious errors, ethical breaches, or integrity issues are identified after publication, the journal will:

  • Publish corrections (Erratum or Corrigendum)

  • Issue transparent retractions when necessary

  • Update indexes and inform readers

Digital Preservation
All published content is permanently archived in trusted repositories to ensure accessibility and long-term citation.

6. Editorial Board Responsibilities

Selection
Editorial board members are appointed based on expertise, research experience, and commitment to ethical publishing.

Duties
Board members actively contribute to:

  • Peer review processes

  • Shaping editorial strategy and development

  • Upholding high ethical and scientific standards

Rotation
Board composition is periodically updated to promote diversity, innovation, and active engagement.

7. Communication and Transparency

Author Support
The editorial office provides timely support regarding:

  • Submission requirements

  • Manuscript status updates

  • Revision and resubmission guidance

Efficient Communication
All communication between authors, reviewers, and editors must remain professional, transparent, and respectful.

By adhering to these guidelines, Trends in Medical and Biological Sciences ensures the publication of high-quality, ethically sound, and impactful research for the advancement of global medical and biological knowledge.